Businesses, Ed Groups Divided Over Bill To Let Parents Take Time Off For School Related Activities
A children’s committee bill to promote parent engagement in a child’s education has drawn support from education advocates and criticism from the business community. H.B. 6501 would allow employees who have custody of a student in grades K-12 up to 20 hours of parental leave each year to attend ‘school related activities,’ like parent-teacher conferences, back to school night, or school board meetings.
Studies have shown positive association between level of parent involvement and students’ achievement, also finding that students whose parents are engaged are more likely to have better social skills and reach higher levels of education.
“Early childhood education programs…have demonstrated significant short and long-term benefits for children all have intensive family involvement components,” said Marne Usher, Connecticut Parent Teacher Student Association Vice President of Government Relations in testimony to the state legislature’s children’s committee earlier this month. Usher also said that “schools would have to spend $1,000 more per pupil to reap the same gains in student achievement that an involved parent brings.”
Wendy Lecker, of Parents Across America-CT also submitted testimony on the bill, arguing that “Many parents and guardians can simply not get the time off from work to fully engage in their children’s education.”
But Eric Gjede, assistant counsel at the Connecticut Business and Industry Association (CBIA), argued that while parental engagement is important, this measure is not the best way to accomplish that. He said the bill “disregards the staffing needs of employers and conflicts with their policies for requesting and approving time off that were implemented to provide fairness amongst all employees.”
2 Responses to Businesses, Ed Groups Divided Over Bill To Let Parents Take Time Off For School Related Activities
About Capitol Watch

The Hartford Courant’s Capitol Watch blog provides insightful and in-depth coverage of Connecticut politics... read more- -- ADVERTISEMENT --
NEW! CT Politics App.
Courant.com brings you the latest CT political news, blogs, tweets and photos, powered by the Hartford Courant and FOX CT.
Download it now:
Recent Posts
- Mental Health First Aid Training Program Created In Response To Newtown
- State Poised to Restore Benefits to Veterans Discharged Under Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell
- Markey Releases Ad That Mentions Newtown, Attacks Opponent On Guns
- Rep. Toni Walker: “We’re In a Crisis, My Friends”
- Committee Approves Nomination of Gina McCarthy To Head EPA
Recent Comments
- Connecticut is Circling the Drain on Rep. Toni Walker: “We’re In a Crisis, My Friends”
- Quinte West on Rep. Toni Walker: “We’re In a Crisis, My Friends”
- Quinte West on Rep. Toni Walker: “We’re In a Crisis, My Friends”
- kuma138 on Markey Releases Ad That Mentions Newtown, Attacks Opponent On Guns
- Connecticut is Circling the Drain on Markey Releases Ad That Mentions Newtown, Attacks Opponent On Guns
Categories
- 2014 Election
- 2016 Presidential election
- Abortion
- Amtrak
- Andrew Roraback, R
- beer
- Board of Regents for Higher Education
- Brendan Sharkey
- Brian Durand
- Brown Rudnick
- Busway
- Carroll Hughes
- casinos
- Cato Institute
- CCM
- census
- Chase Rogers
- Chris Caruso
- Chris Christie
- Chris Donovan
- Chris Murphy, D
- Chris Shays
- coffee
- Columbine High School
- Congress
- Connecticut
- CRRA
- D-SNAP
- Dan Esty
- David Walker
- DC
- DCCC
- Democrats
- Denise Merrill
- Donald Williams
- Drugs
- Economy
- Education
- Elections 2012
- Elizabeth Esty, D
- Environment
- Ernie Newton
- Federal budget
- Gambling
- General Assembly
- George Jepsen
- George W. Bush
- Gov. Dannel Malloy
- Greenwich
- Gun control
- Hartford
- Health
- Henry Kissinger
- higher education
- Hillary Clinton
- Immigration
- Jerry Labriola
- Jim Himes, D
- Joan Hartley
- Joe Courtney, D
- Joe Lieberman
- Joe McGee
- John DeStefano
- John Henry Decker, R
- John Larson, D
- John McKinney
- John Rowland
- Jonathan Pelto
- Journalism
- Kevin Lembo
- Labor
- Larry Cafero
- Linda McMahon, R
- lottery
- Lowell Weicker
- Mark Boughton
- Mark Greenberg
- Mark Ojakian
- Martin Looney
- Matthew Hennessy
- MetroNorth
- Michael Fedele
- Michelle Obama
- Mitt Romney
- Nancy DiNardo
- Nancy Wyman
- Newtown
- Paul Formica, R
- Paul Ryan
- Pedro Segarra
- Penny Bacchiochi
- Penny Bacchiochi
- People Magazine
- Planned Parenthood
- President Obama
- Ralph Nader
- Republicans
- Richard Blumenthal
- Rosa DeLauro, D
- Roy Occhiogrosso
- Sandy
- Sandy Hook
- Sandyhook
- social media
- State budget
- State of Connecticut
- Steve Obsitnik, R
- Still Revolutionary
- Susan Herbst
- taxes
- teacher unions
- Thomas Peterffy
- Tom Foley
- Tom Ritter
- Toni Walker
- U.S. House, 1st District
- U.S. House, 2nd District
- U.S. House, 3rd District
- U.S. House, 4th District
- U.S. House, 5th District
- U.S. Senate
- UConn
- Uncategorized
- Voices For Children
- Washington
- Wayne Winsley, R
- weather
- West Hartford
- William Tong
- women
- WWE
- Yale University
- Yankee Institute
- -- ADVERTISEMENT --





This problem goes back to last year when they mandated 3 sick days instead of 3 personal flex days. Now we are stuck with another decade where every interest group comes forward looking to expand their days off for specific reasons and this of course will require tracking at work to ensure they complied with each and every new time off regulation and the fulfillment requests to avoid lawsuits.
It’s the way government works. There’s the simple way, through personal days, or selling yourself like stupid whores to every special interest group who walks in the door. Once they started with sick days they won’t be able to stop themselves.
Bring back the old Left. The 3 floating Holiday Democrats. Not the new Left Democrats. The ones who want to classify each and every Holiday and require some proof of compliance and allegiance behind each request for time off for each Holiday and Yes! Can we means test these requests with triplicate forms!
Tell them to take a hike. All of them. Nearest pier. Thank you.
Absolutely parents should be allowed legally-protected rights to time off without any recourse to attend to school-related meetings. I saw parents who lost their jobs at casinos because they responded to the “urgent” calls of Administrators. The threat of being fired for accruing “points” for a no show or leaving for a critical meeting should be stopped by all employers when parents are trying to be responsible! If we want to prevent student violence, increase attendance, and promote good citizenship through academic success, we as a society must show respect for parents as well.