‘Bysiewicz Bill’ Tanks For 2nd Straight Year
A bill that would have simplified the qualifications for service as Connecticut’s attorney general has failed for the second straight year. The measure became officially dead Wednesday at midnight, when the 2012 legislative session adjourned without the Senate or House ever bringing it up for a vote.
Informally called the “Bysiewicz Bill,” it grew out of Democrat Susan Bysiewicz’s unsuccessful effort to win her party’s 2010 nomination for attorney general. The bill would have set the requirement for attorney general simply as 10 years’ admission to the Connecticut bar as a lawyer. That would have been a change from the current, 115-year-old requirement that a person have at least 10 years’ experience in the “active practice” of law in Connecticut.
In 2010, the state Supreme Court blocked Bysiewicz’s attorney general campaign effort by ruling her ineligible for the office. It ruled that the vague requirement for 10 years’ “active practice” means “at least some experience litigating cases in court.” Bysiewicz had been a lawyer more than 10 years but had not tried a case in court.
Democratic proponents of the “Bysiewicz Bill” this year never overcame Republicans’ criticism that the proposed change would render meaningless the legal qualifications required to serve as attorney general. If all a person had to do was pass the bar exam and then just pay the annual fees to maintain a law license for 10 years, he or she could do some job that is completely unrelated to the law and still become attorney general, the critics said.
Rep. Gerald M. Fox III, D-Stamford, co-chairman of the legislative judiciary committee, said Wednesday night that no one could agree on new wording this year. Each time language was proposed to describe the quality or quantity of legal work that an attorney general candidate needs to have done, it seemed to open up a further risk for future legal challenges to a candidate’s eligibility for the office, Fox said.
“I’m still hopeful that we cab get something through next year,” Fox said.
The next election for state attorney general is in 2014.
Bysiewicz is now seeking the Democratic nomination for this year’s U.S. Senate nomination. Her Democratic rival in 2010, former state Senate Majority Leader George Jepsen, went on to win the election and now is state attorney general.
One Response to ‘Bysiewicz Bill’ Tanks For 2nd Straight Year
About Capitol Watch

The Hartford Courant’s Capitol Watch blog provides insightful and in-depth coverage of Connecticut politics... read more- -- ADVERTISEMENT --
NEW! CT Politics App.
Courant.com brings you the latest CT political news, blogs, tweets and photos, powered by the Hartford Courant and FOX CT.
Download it now:
Recent Posts
- House Approves Undocumented Immigrant Drivers License Bill After All-Night Debate
- Praise — and a Gaffe — from Biden
- House Briefly Debates Strengthening State’s Racial Profiling Law; Already Passed In Senate
- Newspapers, Broadcasters, FOI Council All Question Newtown FOI Disclosure Bill
- Lawmakers Concerned About Newtown FOI Bill And Balancing Public’s Right To Know
Recent Comments
- Gregg 3 Gs on House Approves Undocumented Immigrant Drivers License Bill After All-Night Debate
- The Racist on House Approves Undocumented Immigrant Drivers License Bill After All-Night Debate
- CTAShipOfFools on House Approves Undocumented Immigrant Drivers License Bill After All-Night Debate
- CPEve on House Approves Undocumented Immigrant Drivers License Bill After All-Night Debate
- bill on House Approves Undocumented Immigrant Drivers License Bill After All-Night Debate
Categories
- 2014 Election
- 2016 Presidential election
- Abortion
- Amtrak
- Andrew Roraback, R
- beer
- Board of Regents for Higher Education
- Brendan Sharkey
- Brian Durand
- Brown Rudnick
- Busway
- Carroll Hughes
- casinos
- Cato Institute
- CCM
- census
- Chase Rogers
- Chris Caruso
- Chris Christie
- Chris Donovan
- Chris Murphy, D
- Chris Shays
- coffee
- Columbine High School
- Congress
- Connecticut
- CRRA
- D-SNAP
- Dan Esty
- David Walker
- DC
- DCCC
- Democrats
- Denise Merrill
- Donald Williams
- Drugs
- Economy
- Education
- Elections 2012
- Elizabeth Esty, D
- Environment
- Ernie Newton
- Federal budget
- Gambling
- General Assembly
- George Jepsen
- George W. Bush
- Gov. Dannel Malloy
- Greenwich
- Gun control
- Hartford
- Health
- Henry Kissinger
- higher education
- Hillary Clinton
- Immigration
- Jerry Labriola
- Jim Himes, D
- Joan Hartley
- Joe Biden
- Joe Courtney, D
- Joe Lieberman
- Joe McGee
- John DeStefano
- John Henry Decker, R
- John Larson, D
- John McKinney
- John Rowland
- Jonathan Pelto
- Journalism
- Kevin Lembo
- Labor
- Larry Cafero
- Linda McMahon, R
- lottery
- Lowell Weicker
- Mark Boughton
- Mark Greenberg
- Mark Ojakian
- Martin Looney
- Matthew Hennessy
- MetroNorth
- Michael Fedele
- Michelle Obama
- Mitt Romney
- Nancy DiNardo
- Nancy Wyman
- Newtown
- Paul Formica, R
- Paul Ryan
- Pedro Segarra
- Penny Bacchiochi
- Penny Bacchiochi
- People Magazine
- Planned Parenthood
- President Obama
- Ralph Nader
- Republicans
- Richard Blumenthal
- Rosa DeLauro, D
- Roy Occhiogrosso
- Sandy
- Sandy Hook
- Sandyhook
- social media
- State budget
- State of Connecticut
- Steve Obsitnik, R
- Still Revolutionary
- Susan Herbst
- taxes
- teacher unions
- Thomas Peterffy
- Tom Foley
- Tom Ritter
- Toni Walker
- U.S. House, 1st District
- U.S. House, 2nd District
- U.S. House, 3rd District
- U.S. House, 4th District
- U.S. House, 5th District
- U.S. Senate
- UConn
- Uncategorized
- Voices For Children
- Washington
- Wayne Winsley, R
- weather
- West Hartford
- William Tong
- women
- WWE
- Yale University
- Yankee Institute
- -- ADVERTISEMENT --





Why is it that our esteemed legislators continue to think they need new laws when the old laws seem to be working just fine. Just because the law was challenged(and upheld) does not mean it it is faulty…just the opposite it means that the law has some teeth and is fair and just…stop propping up a cronie by trying to change the law…