Checking Some Facts: Thursday’s GOP Senate Debate
Republican U.S. Senate candidates Linda McMahon and Christopher Shays debated each other Thursday at the University of Connecticut in Storrs, their first one-on-one match-up of the primary season. You can read the full story about the debate here and the debate was broadcast statewide tonight on Fox CT.
Both candidates hit each other hard on the economy and other issues and the Courant checked a few of those statements for fact below:
Shays, on the U.S. economy: “It’s not natural to have 15-20 million people unemployed.”
The number of people Shays cited was true. According a June 1 report from the federal Bureau of Labor Statistics, there were about 12.7 million “unemployed persons” in the U.S., the number of people without work who have looked for a job within the past four weeks. The official unemployment rate was 8.2 percent.
However, the report says that an additional 2.4 million people were “marginally attached” to the workforce—people who aren’t working but wanted to and were available to and had looked for work in the past 12 months. When combined with the 12.7 million unemployed people, the total number is 15.1 million people unemployed, near the lower bound of Shays’ range.
And the report also notes that 8.1 million people are working part-time because their hours have been cut back or they are unable to find a full-time job. When combined with the unemployed and the marginally attached, the total number grows to 23.2 million people who are either unemployed or underemployed.
McMahon, on government spending: “Let me give you a staggering example: When the recession began, we had one member of the (federal)
Department of Transportation that made over $170,000. Eighteen months into the current administration, we have 1,690 that make over $170,000.”
Correction: True. A 2009 article from USA Today reported this fact almost exactly. An earlier version of this blog post cited a FactCheck.org post about a statement made by Minnesota Republican congresswoman Michelle Bachmann made before Bachmann announced her run for U.S. President. Using data from the federal Office of Personnel Management, that website found that about two-thirds of those employees were making more than $170,000 before President Barack Obama took office. But Bachmann’s statement said that the workers were added after President Barack Obama took office. In Thursday’s debate, McMahon said the workers were added after the start of the recession, which began long before Obama took office, as was reported by the newspaper in 2010.
Shays: McMahon contributed to the campaigns of prominent Democrats such as Rahm Emanuel.
True. Federal campaign finance records (which you can search here by a contributor’s employer) shows that Linda McMahon of World Wrestling Federation made contributions to Emanuel in 2002, 2004, 2005 and 2008. The contributions totaled about $5,300. Emanuel, a Democrat who represented Chicago’s western suburbs, held his seat until early 2009, when he resigned to become President Obama’s Chief of Staff. He is now the mayor of Chicago.
McMahon: “We have 47 (federal government) programs for job training.”
True. According to Politifact.com, the federal Government Accountability Office published a 2011 report that found the federal government has 47 job training programs run by nine agencies. Republican presidential candidate and former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney made a similar claim at a campaign stop in Florida last month, though he was slightly off with his numbers.
Shays, on jobs in Connecticut: “As long as we have a governor and a Legislature that taxes wealth, it will flee. We rank at the very bottom because wealth is fleeing.”
Could be false. Shays didn’t say what Connecticut ranks at the bottom in–but it probably isn’t money and wealth. According Census data (PDF, table 719) from 2004, the most recent year for which data is available, Connecticut had about 47,000 “top wealth holders” with a net worth of at least $1.5 million. That’s far from the highest in the nation (that goes to California, with 428,000 “top wealth holders”) but it’s also far from the bottom–states there had less than 10,000 top wealth holders.
Looking to more recent U.S. Census data, Connecticut had a median household income of $67,740 from 2006-2010, significantly higher than the U.S. average. And Connecticut isn’t at the bottom in terms of current unemployment, either: the state ranks 30th, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, with an April unemployment rate of 7.7 percent–but unemployment rate was lower than the national average at the time and still is. Numbers for the state’s May unemployment situation are due out later this month.
McMahon: “Kids out of college can’t get a job. One out of two is either unemployed or underemployed.”
True. An analysis of 2011 Census Bureau data by Northeastern University researchers, reported in May, found that about 53.6 percent of people under 25 who held a bachelor’s degree were either unemployed or underemployed.
One Response to Checking Some Facts: Thursday’s GOP Senate Debate
About Capitol Watch

The Hartford Courant’s Capitol Watch blog provides insightful and in-depth coverage of Connecticut politics... read more- -- ADVERTISEMENT --
NEW! CT Politics App.
Courant.com brings you the latest CT political news, blogs, tweets and photos, powered by the Hartford Courant and FOX CT.
Download it now:
Recent Comments
- Johngaltwhereru on Occupy Hartford Promises To Return
- Johngaltwhereru on Occupy Hartford Promises To Return
- BobC on House Approves Sunday Deer Hunting on Private Land; Controversial In The Past
- The Conn-servative on Malloy Defends Secretly Drafted Bill To Block Release Of Investigative Records From Newtown Massacre
- Connecticut is Circling the Drain on Blumenthal Is Everywhere This Weekend!
Categories
- 2014 Election
- 2016 Presidential election
- Abortion
- Amtrak
- Andrew Roraback, R
- beer
- Board of Regents for Higher Education
- Brendan Sharkey
- Brian Durand
- Brown Rudnick
- Busway
- Carroll Hughes
- casinos
- Cato Institute
- CCM
- census
- Chase Rogers
- Chris Caruso
- Chris Christie
- Chris Donovan
- Chris Murphy, D
- Chris Shays
- coffee
- Columbine High School
- Congress
- Connecticut
- CRRA
- D-SNAP
- Dan Esty
- David Walker
- DC
- DCCC
- Democrats
- Denise Merrill
- Donald Williams
- Drugs
- Economy
- Education
- Elections 2012
- Elizabeth Esty, D
- Environment
- Ernie Newton
- Federal budget
- Gambling
- General Assembly
- George Jepsen
- George W. Bush
- Gov. Dannel Malloy
- Greenwich
- Gun control
- Hartford
- Health
- Henry Kissinger
- higher education
- Hillary Clinton
- Immigration
- Jerry Labriola
- Jim Himes, D
- Joan Hartley
- Joe Biden
- Joe Courtney, D
- Joe Lieberman
- Joe McGee
- John DeStefano
- John Henry Decker, R
- John Larson, D
- John McKinney
- John Rowland
- Jonathan Pelto
- Journalism
- Kevin Lembo
- Labor
- Larry Cafero
- Linda McMahon, R
- lottery
- Lowell Weicker
- Mark Boughton
- Mark Greenberg
- Mark Ojakian
- Martin Looney
- Matthew Hennessy
- MetroNorth
- Michael Fedele
- Michelle Obama
- Mitt Romney
- Nancy DiNardo
- Nancy Wyman
- Newtown
- Paul Formica, R
- Paul Ryan
- Pedro Segarra
- Penny Bacchiochi
- Penny Bacchiochi
- People Magazine
- Planned Parenthood
- President Obama
- Ralph Nader
- Republicans
- Richard Blumenthal
- Rosa DeLauro, D
- Roy Occhiogrosso
- Sandy
- Sandy Hook
- Sandyhook
- social media
- State budget
- State of Connecticut
- Steve Obsitnik, R
- Still Revolutionary
- Susan Herbst
- taxes
- teacher unions
- Thomas Peterffy
- Tom Foley
- Tom Ritter
- Toni Walker
- U.S. House, 1st District
- U.S. House, 2nd District
- U.S. House, 3rd District
- U.S. House, 4th District
- U.S. House, 5th District
- U.S. Senate
- UConn
- Uncategorized
- Voices For Children
- Washington
- Wayne Winsley, R
- weather
- West Hartford
- William Tong
- women
- WWE
- Yale University
- Yankee Institute
- -- ADVERTISEMENT --







Ms McMahon touts her experience as a successful CEO,though one could question how that success was achieved…..however, to say running the WWE is a qualification to make national fiscal and economic policy is like saying that falling into a mud puddle means you can make it rain……does not follow. World of difference between rolling in the mud and cleaning up the fiscal mess.