The secretary of the state ruled against Republicans on Friday, saying that the Democrats will keep the top line on the 2012 election ballot.

Republicans had appealed the decision of Secretary of the State Denise Merrill, a longtime Democrat, to place the Democrats on the top line in the 2011 municipal elections after charging that Merrill made a mistake last year on the ballot line because of the complicated results of the 2010 race for governor.

Although Democrat Dannel P. Malloy won the race in 2010, he did it with a combination of votes from both the Democratic Party and the union-backed Working Families Party. As a result, Republican Tom Foley captured more votes on the Republican line than Malloy captured on the Democratic line.

The top party on the line is normally the party of the winning candidate for governor, but the Republicans now want that reversed because of Foley’s vote count.

“We believe we have a solid case to make that Republican candidates for office this fall should be placed first, based on the results of the 2010 gubernatorial election,” House GOP leader Larry Cafero of Norwalk said. “We have case law to support our position.”

But Merrill said in a letter Friday that she interpreted the law in a different way.

Merrill wrote to Cafero and others that “you do not differentiate between the appearance of a candidate on the ballot by party nomination and by nominating petition with a party designation. Taking this crucial difference into account results in the conclusion reached by my office in 2011: the Democratic Party is listed on the first row on the ballot followed by the Republican Party listed on the second row.”

The key point, according to Merrill, is that “votes cast for candidates appearing on two separate lines on the ballot are to be treated as votes for the candidate and included in such candidate’s vote totals for such election.’’

To back up their case, Republicans cited the election of Republican Governor George Pataki in New York State in 1994. Pataki defeated incumbent Governor Mario Cuomo, but only after the votes of the Republican and Conservative Party lines were added together. As a Democrat, Cuomo captured more votes on his line than Pataki did on the Republican line.

For the next four years, the Democrats held the top spot on the ballot in New York State.

“For purposes of balloting, we should be on the top line,’’ Cafero said Thursday in an interview. “Mario Cuomo had the most on the Democratic line. … We are stating that the Secretary of the State got it wrong in 2011.’’

But Merrill said Friday that there are differences in the precise language of the laws between New York and Connecticut – leading to a different result.

Merrill is a Democrat who was elected in the statewide election at the same time as Malloy in November 2010.

Merrill’s spokesman, Av Harris, said Thursday that Republicans would have the right to file a lawsuit over the issue if they disagreed with Merrill’s interpretation.

“It’s pretty normal for our office to get sued during an election year,” Harris said. “If they feel that determination aggrieves them in any way or does them harm, of course they can seek redress in the courts. That would be true if anybody was upset with any determination we made.”

Sen. Andrew Roraback, a Republican who represents 15 towns in Litchfield County, was disappointed by Merrill’s ruling.

“The thing about the Democrats having a monopoly on power in Connecticut is that it puts them in a position of saying, ‘Heads I win, tails you lose,’ ‘’ Roraback said. “We have been shut out, and that’s not only bad for Republicans, but it’s bad for all citizens of Connecticut.”

He added, “My campaign certainly isn’t going to go to court over this, but I would not be disappointed if the state Republican Party chose to get a ruling. It’s only fair that if you don’t secure the majority of votes on your party’s line, that you shouldn’t get that added boost. You can’t have your cake and eat it, too.’’

 

9 Responses to Denise Merrill Rules Against Republicans; Democrats Will Keep Top Line On Election Ballots

  1. Anderson Scooper says:

    The Republicans don’t hold a statewide seat, nor anything at a federal level. Yet they think they should hold the top-line on the Connecticut ballot?

    Laughable. As laughable as Jerry Labriola Jr.’s failed bid for Congress.

    Anyway, let the whining begin!

  2. baborn3 says:

    If I were the Republican candidate, Green Party candidate or an Independent candidate I think that my main concern
    would be if Merrill was even going to list me on the Ballot and if she did would it be in 8 PT type somewhere under Malloy’s 72 PT top, center and bottom listing.

  3. Secretary of the State Denise -the Rat- Merrill won’t let a little thing like the law get in the way. Her logic is nonsensical. If it were as she explains it, the Working Families Party (a.k.a. the Communist Party) would be second and Republicans third.

    Really now, someone as partisan as Merrill should be trusted with the task of administering the elections. I am not a bit surprised by her ruling. Republicans should absolutely hit her with a lawsuit.

    Republicans need to field at top drawer candidate for next time. Such a person may not want to run (like maybe Pam Sawyer or Pauline Kezer) but he or she must. Their country needs them! There is no telling what she is up to that we don’t know about. How many Republican work in her office? I would like to know that.

    There should be a website like “Merrill Watch” where people could share tidbits of information about what shenanigans her office is up to.

  4. John Kilian says:

    This is where the judiciary earns its money. No one can trust a politician to rule fairly on a political process that impacts the advantages in an election.

  5. Mr. Ed says:

    Ed, did you read the statute? The Democrat candidate was outpolled by the Republican candidate. Without the union-fed Working Parties line, Tom Foley is our governor.

    I’ll copy it for you below, and maybe you can learn something.

    (a) The names of the parties shall be arranged on the machines in the following order:

    (1) The party whose candidate for Governor polled the highest number of votes in the last-preceding election;

    (2) Other parties who had candidates for Governor in the last-preceding election, in descending order, according to the number of votes polled for each such candidate;

    (3) Minor parties who had no candidate for Governor in the last-preceding election;

    (4) Petitioning candidates with party designation whose names are contained in petitions approved pursuant to section 9-453o, and

    (5) Petitioning candidates with no party designation whose names are contained in petitions approved pursuant to section 9-453o.

    By the way, how’s Hope and Change treating you these days? How about the Malloy Administration?

    • Anderson Scooper says:

      Did you even read Secretary Merrill’s opinion?

      Please tell me the answer to #1) The Party whose candidate for Governor polled the highest number of votes in the last-preceding election.

      Clearly that is Dan Malloy.

      But I agree with you that the Working Families Party is more relevant than the CT GOP, and yes, they should hold the 2nd ballot line!