Lawmakers Ponder Redefining a Meeting

by Categorized: General Assembly Date:

Lawmakers are considering a bill that would carve out a new exception to the state\’s open meeting law.

\"closedSenate Bill 1148 would \”exempt certain negotiations between the leaders of political parties from being considered a meeting for purposes of the Freedom of Information Act.\”

In essence, the bill would permit leaders of different political parties to negotiate in secret even if they comprise a quorum.

The legislature\’s government administration and elections committee is scheduled to hold a hearing on the bill at 11 a.m. Monday in room 2B of the legislative office building.

Here\’s the language, with the changes proposed in red:

(2) \”Meeting\” means any hearing or other proceeding of a public agency, any convening or assembly of a quorum of a multimember public agency, and any communication by or to a quorum of a multimember public agency, whether in person or by means of electronic equipment, to discuss or act upon a matter over which the public agency has supervision, control, jurisdiction or advisory power. \”Meeting\” does not include…  (E) negotiations between members of different political parties who are in a leadership position, with respect to proposed legislation or a proposed action of the public agency to which such members belong, notwithstanding that such members also constitute a quorum of a public agency;  

The Courant is using Facebook comments on stories. To comment on articles, sign into Facebook and enter your comment in the field below. Comments will appear in your Facebook News Feed unless you choose otherwise. To report spam or abuse, click the X next to the comment. For guidelines on commenting, click here.

2 thoughts on “Lawmakers Ponder Redefining a Meeting

  1. Pingback: Two Proposals Threaten Transparency in Connecticut – Connecticut SPJ

Comments are closed.