McMahon’s Total Spending Closes In On $100 Million Over Two Cycles
Linda McMahon, the former CEO of WWE, has spent $42.6 in her current run for U.S. Senate, making her total investment in two runs for the office nearly $100 million.
McMahon spent $49.5 million in her failed bid for Senate in 2010.
New campaign finance reports show McMahon lent her campaign another $3.3 million this week.
McMahon, a Republican, is running against Democratic U.S. Rep. Chris Murphy for the open seat. A recent Quinnipiac University poll shows Murphy leading by 6 percentage points, though McMahon’s campaign said its internal polls show that the race is much closer.
6 Responses to McMahon’s Total Spending Closes In On $100 Million Over Two Cycles
About Capitol Watch

The Hartford Courant’s Capitol Watch blog provides insightful and in-depth coverage of Connecticut politics... read more- -- ADVERTISEMENT --
NEW! CT Politics App.
Courant.com brings you the latest CT political news, blogs, tweets and photos, powered by the Hartford Courant and FOX CT.
Download it now:
Recent Posts
- DeLauro, Esty Slam 20-Week Abortion Bill in House
- Markley To Convene Informational Hearing on Fluoride in Drinking Water
- Malloy, Utilities: We’re Ready for the Storms
- Sharkey Joins Biden To Push Gun Violence Prevention Legislation
- NTSB, Blumenthal Demand Metro-North Change Safety Rules after Worker’s Death
Recent Comments
- Lorenzo on Sharkey Joins Biden To Push Gun Violence Prevention Legislation
- Sean Murphy on Markley To Convene Informational Hearing on Fluoride in Drinking Water
- Don Pesci on Sharkey Joins Biden To Push Gun Violence Prevention Legislation
- Tom Catalina on Another Hat in the Ring for State GOP Chair
- Johngaltwhereru on Perry Strikes More Diplomatic Tone in Hartford
Categories
- 2014 Election
- 2016 Presidential election
- Abortion
- Amtrak
- Andrew Roraback, R
- beer
- Board of Regents for Higher Education
- Brendan Sharkey
- Brian Durand
- Brown Rudnick
- Busway
- Carroll Hughes
- casinos
- Cato Institute
- CCM
- census
- Chase Rogers
- Chris Caruso
- Chris Christie
- Chris Dodd
- Chris Donovan
- Chris Murphy
- Chris Murphy, D
- Chris Shays
- CL&P
- coffee
- Columbine High School
- Congress
- Connecticut
- CRRA
- D-SNAP
- Dan Esty
- David Walker
- DC
- DCCC
- Democrats
- Denise Merrill
- Donald Williams
- Drugs
- Economy
- Education
- Elections 2012
- Elizabeth Esty, D
- Environment
- Eric Coleman
- Ernie Newton
- Federal budget
- Gambling
- General Assembly
- George Jepsen
- George W. Bush
- Gov. Dannel Malloy
- Greenwich
- Gun control
- Hartford
- Health
- Henry Kissinger
- higher education
- Hillary Clinton
- Immigration
- Jerry Labriola
- Jim Himes, D
- Joan Hartley
- Joe Biden
- Joe Courtney, D
- Joe Lieberman
- Joe McGee
- John DeStefano
- John Henry Decker, R
- John Kissel
- John Larson, D
- John McKinney
- John Rowland
- Jonathan Pelto
- Journalism
- Kevin Lembo
- Labor
- Larry Cafero
- Linda McMahon, R
- lottery
- Lowell Weicker
- Mark Boughton
- Mark Greenberg
- Mark Ojakian
- Martin Looney
- Matthew Hennessy
- MetroNorth
- Michael Fedele
- Michelle Obama
- Mitt Romney
- Nancy DiNardo
- Nancy Wyman
- Newtown
- Paul Formica, R
- Paul Ryan
- Pedro Segarra
- Penny Bacchiochi
- Penny Bacchiochi
- People Magazine
- Planned Parenthood
- President Obama
- Ralph Nader
- Republicans
- Richard Blumenthal
- Rosa DeLauro, D
- Roy Occhiogrosso
- Sandy
- Sandy Hook
- Sandyhook
- social media
- State budget
- State of Connecticut
- Steve Obsitnik, R
- Still Revolutionary
- Susan Herbst
- taxes
- teacher unions
- Thomas Peterffy
- Tom Foley
- Tom Ritter
- Toni Walker
- Transportation
- Trees
- U.S. House, 1st District
- U.S. House, 2nd District
- U.S. House, 3rd District
- U.S. House, 4th District
- U.S. House, 5th District
- U.S. Senate
- UConn
- Uncategorized
- United Illuminating
- Utilities
- Voices For Children
- Washington
- Wayne Winsley, R
- weather
- West Hartford
- William Tong
- women
- WWE
- Yale University
- Yankee Institute
- -- ADVERTISEMENT --





A real fiscal conservative!?!!
Fiscal conservatism relates to Government’s spending of money that was involuntarily taken from those who earned it through their work, not personal spending.
How much of that 100 million is from the 10 million that the government gave the WWE?
The government did not give WWE $10 million. That is a common misconception held by liberals who have no concept of how the tax credits work. It’s not your fault though. Liberal politicians and their supporters ram this lie down your throat, and if you don’t have any reason to know the truth, you just believe the lie.
WWE’s tax credit reduced WWE’s tax burden. WWE paid taxes above and beyond the credit. This does not work like the refundable tax credits given to the poor, where the government pays them to exist while they pay no taxes.
In order to believe WWE was “given” $10 million, you would have to believe all money belongs to the government. It does not.
“WWE received $9.8 million in credits for production work through the program in 2009; $7.2 million in 2010; $7.3 million in 2011; $7.5 million so far this year; and $5 million for digital upgrades in 2010, according to state data supplied at The Courant’s request.”
The numbers above add up to $36.8 million total tax credits received by WWE.
“Those tax credits exceed WWE’s state earnings tax liability, said George Barrios, the WWE chief financial officer, who also supplied the figures. That means WWE is in the business of selling state tax credits at a profit.”
The company that buys a tax credit uses it to reduce their taxes by that exact amount. They would be foolish to buy a credit they don’t intend to use. This reduces the taxes received by the state treasury by the amount of the credit thus sold.
http://www.courant.com/business/hc-haar-wwe-tax-credits-20121019,0,1452243.column
There is a reason that in many European Societies,
Americans are considered Vulgar Barbarians.
I think that Linda McMahon is much better off
deciding who will rub their face in Rikkishi`s Butt Crack, than managing federal policy from the floor of The United States Senate.
Raise a Glass for a Champipple Toast !
” You can vote for Barack Obama And Linda McMahon ”
A picture begins to emerge :
Linda McMahon is nothing more than an old Carnival Barker.
She will say anything to get people to play her game.
The prizes offered … Chrome plated plastic trinkets.
Come on people! This isn`t even funny!
I don’t want to live in the state known for putting
Linda McMahon on the floor of The U.S. Senate ! !
She clearly illustrates having nothing intellectually to offer Connecticut in terms of a United States Senator. This is nothing but an empty facade; Behind Linda McMahon’s eyes exsists a vast void. Personally, I don’t think she has the capacity for the level of intelligence, or thought to perform as a United States Senator ; And I think her level of abstract thought and reasoning belongs on children`s television, Saturday Mornings.
Rod Serling steps out from around the corner, And offers a Narrative :
” Submitted for your approval: Linda McMahon,
Roller Derby Queen, or United States Senator?
You decide your reality, when you cast your vote in The Twighlight Zone “
One day Linda McMahon is designing the next gimmick and theme of the next TV Wrestler; And the next day she`s discussing defense contracts and budget issues with The Department of Defense ? ! ? ! This is a sick and perverse dream ! Too Much Cotton Candy at The Carnival Children ! Come On ! ! !
You can put lipstick on an old Carnival Barker, and what have you got? An old carnival barker wearing lipstick !
Is this the best the Republican Party can put forth in Connecticut ?
Linda McMahon ? ! ? !
What do the old Republican Stalwarts think of this ?
Don’t show up to a gun-fight with a clown !