Less than 10 weeks before an August 14 primary, Linda McMahon has opened up a large lead over Republican rival Christopher Shays in the U.S. Senate race, according to this morning’s Quinnipiac University poll.

McMahon, the co-founder and former CEO of WWE, who won the endorsement of Republicans at the state convention last month, leads Shays, a former Congressman, by 29 percentage points.

“Linda McMahon is now the clear frontrunner for the GOP nod, crushing Congressmen Christopher Shays by 29 points, after having led Shays by only 9 points back in March. It is hard to see how Shays can overcome such a large lead by primary day, August 14,” Quinnipiac Poll Director Douglas Schwartz said.

On the Democratic side, convention-endorsed candidate Chris Murphy, a Congressman from the state’s 5th District, leads former Secretary of the State Susan Bysiewicz by 30 points.

In a head-to-head general election match-up, McMahon is also doing better against Murphy: Murphy gets 46 percent to McMahon’s 43 percent, compared to a 52 – 37 percent Murphy lead in the March Q poll. Among unaffiliated voters, the two are essentially tied.

McMahon’s surge in this poll — and the fact she is doing better against Murphy — takes away a key argument made by Shays: that he is the more electable of the two Republicans.

“McMahon’s improvement in the general election against Murphy is due to her better performance among independent voters. She now has 43 percent of these key voters, to Murphy’s 41 percent, overcoming a 15-point deficit in March,” Schwartz said. “Unlike in our last poll, McMahon would be a stronger candidate than Shays against Murphy.”

McMahon, who spent $50 million of her vast fortune in her losing 2010 bid for a Senate seat, has been running television ads for weeks. She is the only candidate currently on the air.

Shortly after the poll was released, McMahon tweeted a message to supporters. “Rs need to unite behind our campaign. Let’s focus on the real opponent-Murphy and professional political class killing jobs & econ. recovery,” she wrote.

Yet the poll showed areas of hope for both Murphy and Shays — and a possible problem for McMahon. Her unfavorable ratings are significantly higher than those of her two closest opponents. McMahon is seen unfavorably by nearly 40 percent of those polled, a slight improvement from the 44 percent unfavorable rating she notched in the March Q poll.

“We have our work cut out for us,” Shays spokeswoman Amanda Bergen said this morning. “We’ve been in this position before and won. Christopher has won 18 elections, including some very tough ones. He has the experience, knowledge and guts to hit the ground running on Day 1.”

Murphy and Shays are relatively unknown to much of the electorate: 46 percent said they hadn’t heard enough of Murphy to form an opinion.  Shays, who spent 21 years in Congress, remains unknown to 44 percent.

Voters also believed being a member or former member of Congress is a better qualification for a U.S. Senate candidate than running  wrestling and entertainment company. Fifty eight percent said Murphy has “the right kind of experience” to be a U.S. Senator, and 58 percent said Shays did.

In contrast, voters were split, 46 to 45 percent, over whether McMahon had the right experience for the job, even though she touts her years running WWE as her chief qualification for serving in the U.S. Senate.

The WWE, which made McMahon a multimillionaire and is still run by her husband, Vince McMahon, has become a source of controversy in the campaign, with some critics comparing its sexually suggestive content to pornography. Yet most voters disagree: 56 percent said WWE’s product is not pornographic, while 10 percent said it is and 33 percent had no opinion.

Fifty four percent of those polled said they want to see a “Washington outsider” as the state’s next Senator and 64 percent said they’d like to see more women in political office. Yet just 14 percent said they’d be more likely to support McMahon because she’d be the first women senator from Connecticut. For Bysiewicz, that number was 16 percent.

The poll showed Bysiewicz losing to all of the candidates from both parties, but her campaign remained on message this morning, continuing its effort to paint Murphy as a politician in the pocket of powerful Wall Street interests.

“Today’s poll does nothing to change the fact that Chris Murphy has taken over hundreds of thousands of dollars from Wall Street PACs, refused to return JP Morgan’s PAC contributions in the wake of their $2 billion loss driven by a return to casino style trading, and has no plan to hold Wall Street Accountable or fix the economy,” campaign manager Jonathan Ducote said in an email. “This election is about who will stand up for the middle class and hold Wall Street Accountable. Over the next two and a half months we’ll engage the 700,000 Democrats who are eligible to vote in the August primary about who has the best plan to accomplish these goals.“

Murphy spokeswoman Taylor Lavender highlighted his enormous lead over Bysiewicz. “No one in the field can match Chris’ record of fighting for middle class jobs and families in Connecticut,” she said in a statement.

“That’s why Democrats support him by a 30 point margin to take on Linda McMahon in November. McMahon has already spent millions on the air trying to change her image, and ultimately we know that she is going to massively outspend us on the airwaves. But we’re building the best and strongest grassroots campaign Connecticut has ever seen, and just like in 2010, voters aren’t going to let McMahon buy this election.”

The poll of 1,408 registered voters was conducted from May 29 to June 3. The survey of 381 Republicans has a margin of error of plus or minus 5 percentage points and of 538 Democrats, with a margin of error of plus or minus 4.2 percentage points.

 

 

 

 

 

9 Responses to Murphy, McMahon Open Up Big Primary Leads In Race For Senate

  1. Mike says:

    This is all fine, but the way she treated her employees is a turn off. Just another (non-elected) politician out to line her own pocket and fluff her ego.

  2. baborn3 says:

    Nice choice of pictures used to accompany the article.
    I would say they were chosen by a high school sophomore, someone in the tank for Murphy … oh, that’s right, the Courant is infested with Liberals (faux journalists).

  3. robynware says:

    Of course she is polling better than expected – she has inundated the airwaves with her ads. If you were sick of seeing her ads in 2010, you better get your barf bag out – it will be worse this time. She has tons of money and is not afraid to use it. We are letting our government be sold to the highest bidder. It really makes me sad.

  4. bill morin says:

    alot of bashing, but wwe has done more for disabled, and sick children the world over. Make a Wish Foundation gets alot of charity money and work from wwe and wrestlers who visit children who sometimes is a last wish. Politicians dont want to admit that, just what wwe once was.no papers will do a story about this either which shows their blindsight

  5. bill says:

    typical. Those on the opposing side always use the word millions will buy votes. Is it not what each side is doing? People are just upset it’s not their pick of the litter who is doing it. I dont watch Political advertisments or listen to crying editors trying to cover their Bias which has shown thru the years. As far as WWE goes, why isnt the press showing the millions donated over teh years to charities such as Make a Wish Foundation, or wrestlers who give up their time to travel and visit sick kids with a last wish to see them, or the endless USO shows overseas for our Military. Show me any Politician who has done more, thats the WWE side of the story, they have toned down the raunch years ago yet it gets brought up still. Their ratings show more people care about the WWE then watching Political events or voting for that matter. I would rather have more business women running the show then career politicians who hang on to their job by promising more next term. More of the same is not always helping Citizens.

  6. bill says:

    no one brings up the fact that Kennedy’s made their fortune bootlegging alcohol.