Jenny Wilson talked with Chris Murphy in Meriden Thursday morning:
If you enjoyed this article, please consider sharing it!
13 Responses to Murphy: The Race Is Headed In Our Direction
About Capitol Watch
The Hartford Courant’s Capitol Watch blog provides insightful and in-depth coverage of Connecticut politics... read more- -- ADVERTISEMENT --
NEW! CT Politics App.
Courant.com brings you the latest CT political news, blogs, tweets and photos, powered by the Hartford Courant and FOX CT.
Download it now:
- -- ADVERTISEMENT --
Linda McMahon is nothing more than an old Carnival Barker.
She will say anything to get people to play her game.
The prizes offered … Chrome plated plastic trinkets.
Come on people! This isn`t even funny!
I don’t want to live in the state known for putting
Linda McMahon on the floor of The U.S. Senate ! !
She clearly illustrates having nothing intellectually to offer Connecticut in terms of a United States Senator. This is nothing but an empty facade; Behind Linda McMahon’s eyes exsists a vast void. Personally, I don’t think she has the capacity for the level of intelligence, or thought to perform as a United States Senator ; And I think her level of abstract thought and reasoning belongs on children`s television, Saturday Mornings.
Vote for Linda McMahon and Jerry Springer on the Champipple Ballot Line.
Kurt Russell and Michael Moore will be using
Connecticut tax credits to produce a new movie for
Monty Python Productions, called : ” Escape From Connecticut ” !
Maybe this is all but a perverse and pathetic dream,
and I’ll wake up. Heh – To think Linda McMahaon a serious contender to represent Connecticut, as a United States Senator!
I gotta stop eating those Chocolate Frosted Sugar Bombs before bed.
Rod Serling steps out from around the corner,
And offers a Narrative :
” Submitted for your approval: Linda McMahon,
Roller Derby Queen, or United States Senator?
You decide your reality, when you cast your vote in
The Twighlight Zone “
You can put lipstick on an old carnival barker;
And all you have is a carnival barker, with lipstick.
Ian Bain: your comments weren’t amusing under your own name, nor are they amusing under the multitude of aliases you continue to post them under.
Is your plan to soil these blogs with multiple, repetitive, simple-minded posts, as you did when comments were allowed in the recent past? We get the point – you don’t have to flood the airwaves like the politicians are doing. It’s a complete turnoff
Does this mean you won’t be fixing me breakfast tomorrrow? Or any time soon?
that answers my question. you’re opting for ‘trolling’. good for you
Speaking of repetative, simple minded posts …
” and only communists, socialists, recipients, and the unintelligent will vote for a socialist to run this decidedly non-socialist country. Patriotism is dead – purchased with food stamps and welfare checks ”
Kim, I like my eggs over easy.
you should look ‘repetitive’ up in the dictionary, then try to associate my statement with ANY OTHER you have seen anwhere. Your eggs aren’t all that you like over easy. Your discussion abilities come to mind. Good for you
” You can vote for Barack Obama And Linda McMahon ”
A picture begins to emerge :
Linda McMahon is nothing more than an old Carnival Barker.
She will say anything to get people to play her game.
The prizes offered … Chrome plated plastic trinkets.
Come on people! This isn`t even funny!
I don’t want to live in the state known for putting
Linda McMahon on the floor of The U.S. Senate ! !
She clearly illustrates having nothing intellectually to offer Connecticut in terms of a United States Senator. This is nothing but an empty facade; Behind Linda McMahon’s eyes exsists a vast void. Personally, I don’t think she has the capacity for the level of intelligence, or thought to perform as a United States Senator ; And I think her level of abstract thought and reasoning belongs on children`s television, Saturday Mornings.
Rod Serling steps out from around the corner,
And offers a Narrative :
” Submitted for your approval: Linda McMahon,
Roller Derby Queen, or United States Senator?
You decide your reality, when you cast your vote in
The Twighlight Zone “
One day Linda McMahon is designing the next gimmick and theme of the next TV Wrestler; And the next day she`s discussing defense contracts and budget issues with The Department of Defense ? ! ? ! This is a sick and perverse dream ! Too Much Cotton Candy at The Carnival Children ! Come On ! ! !
You can put lipstick on an old Carnival Barker, and what have you got? An old carnival barker wearing lipstick !
I’ve learned why you are using multiple aliases and names Ian – it’s because the courant won’t allow you to post (copy and paste) the same bull under the same name. You get error messages chastising you for repeating yourself.
So much for your pseudo lofy preaching about the purity of your message and the truth you’re offering the people. what a hypocrite and a liberal
Not at all true Kim.
I think the Courant identifies me via my
IP # , and/or E-Mail Address.
You are presumptous and confused.
The topic is Connecticut representation in Washington; Please try to stay on point.
Linda McMahon would look better and more appropriate in a red curley wig, red bulbous nose, and big clown shoes;
But, The United States Senate in Washington D.C. hasn`t sunken to quite that level ( yet ).
Thank You for your support.
then you’re simply trying to pull the wool over everyone’s eyes, Ian, kind of like your president does (‘it’s everyone but me’ syndrome).
It’s obvious the reason you are using multiple names is to try to convince others that your twisted and childish views have widespread support. In fact, you stand alone with your schoolyard taunts and name-calling. You have no credibility, Ian, but that’s never stopped you before.
speakinkg of ‘pulling the wool over peoples’ eyes’:
This is what Obama cares about.
‘Cooling out the voters’ or ‘Telling the truth a little at a time’.
http://jewishworldreview.com/cols/sowell103012.php3
Is this the best the Republican Party can put forth in Connecticut ? Linda McMahon ? ! ? !
What do the old Republican Stalwarts think of this ?