Tree Bills on Monday\’s Judiciary Hearing Agenda

by Categorized: Uncategorized Date:

The legislature\’s judiciary committee will hear testimony Monday on two bills regarding a property owner\’s responsibility for maintaining trees.

Senate Bill 987  would require property owners to visually inspect their property and remove any tree limbs that appear \”unhealthy or…potentially dangerous.\” The measure would also stipulate that a  landowner has knowledge of a tree\’s defects if that owner receives a certified letter outlining the tree\’s condition.

A separate proposal, House Bill 6487, would make private property owners liable for removing a limb or a tree if it falls on a neighbor\’s property. The provision, which would exempt certain nonprofit landowners, would apply if an arborist had inspected the tree and documented that it was diseased or likely to fall, or if the adjoining property owner had requested that the tree be removed or pruned and the landowner refused to do so.

Falling trees were a big problem in several of the devastating storms that have struck the state over the past 18 months, including Tropical Storm Irene, the October blizzard and storm Sandy. Generally speaking, the owner of the property where the tree or limb landed — not where the tree\’s roots are — is responsible for the damage if it occurred during a storm.




The Courant is using Facebook comments on stories. To comment on articles, sign into Facebook and enter your comment in the field below. Comments will appear in your Facebook News Feed unless you choose otherwise. To report spam or abuse, click the X next to the comment. For guidelines on commenting, click here.

One thought on “Tree Bills on Monday\’s Judiciary Hearing Agenda

  1. Sharpshooter

    Finally….civil rights for trees…does this include large bushes….how about banzai trees…oh the web they weave when they involve themselves in the ridiculous…

Comments are closed.