Category Archives: Uncategorized

Red Wine, Not Champagne

by Categorized: Uncategorized Date:

Who can feel happy about this?

John Rowland is 57. When he gets out of prison he will be somewhere in his sixties, and, as someone turning 60 in a few weeks, I can assure you Rowland will have squandered more than a few of his last best years on a heartbreaking work of staggering idiocy. For a guy who likes vacations and Mustangs and parties and fishing boats and the good life and the high life, the stretch from 57 to, say, 64, is a sweet spot you don’t want to spend staring at the Loretto commissary bulletin board to see if they have those cashews you like.

So the sentence he will get is implicitly heartbreaking unless you factor in your own outrage at the way things went down in 2004, when a charming (and easily charmed) old softy named Judge Peter Dorsey handed Rowland a year when 5 to 8 would have been generous.

So I had a glass of red wine at the end of this day, but not a split of champagne.

I do say this: Rowland’s defense counsel may be the last ever to use the “feh” defense. From the New York Times:

This is right-wing, hard-core stuff,” the lawyer, Reid H. Weingarten, told the jurors on Thursday afternoon, minutes before they began deliberating, adding, “My biggest fear is that you’ll see the politics in this case and say, ‘Feh.’ ”

Where are we, the Lower East Side in 1958? Meh is the new feh. Everybody knows that.

Anyway, the jury said “feh”  X 7.

Now, would you like to know what happens next?

The judge will give Rowland at least five years and maybe a good bit more. It depends heavily on how she feels about him as a second offender and, indeed, a second offender who seemed not to appreciate the charity extended to him the first time. This is guesswork, but I’m going to say seven years.

Can he appeal successfully? Who knows. I’m no lawyer, but it seemed as though Judge Arterton, in her rulings, was being careful. She ruled favorably for the defense in two high-profile questions — one early in the case having to do with emails accidentally shared with the defense and then late in the game on a question of whether the defense’s one and only witness could be allowed to impeach the testimony of Brian Foley, the star prosecution witness.

And with all of the above in mind, it seems unlikely that Arterton will allow Rowland out on bond while he pursues appeal.

All of the news for Rowland right now is bad. He turned down an 18-month plea deal. Now he’s looking at years. If there’s an ace up anybody’s sleeve, it’s very well hidden.

Questions remain.

1. Why did Reid Weingarten take this case? High profile D.C. lawyer comes up to New Haven to handle the case of a repeat offender who left a lot of reckless evidence against himself. Unless he has a kid at Yale, this makes no sense.

2. Who paid Weingarten?  Not Rowland.

3. What kind of defense was that?  One witness, who faltered badly during cross-examination. And then the “feh” speech. That was supposed to do it? We hate to second guess, but, considering the jury just dropped the Hammer of Thor on your client after a short deliberation, we get to ask.

4. Ah, yes. WTIC.  Rowland’s former employer and mine. The testimony at trial was worse than I expected. One witness described a very porous relationship between Rowland’s strategy sessions for Wilson Foley and what he said on the air.  Confirmed in sworn testimony were Rowland’s attempts to bully his employer’s opponent Andrew Roraback, including getting Roraback’s cell phone number from the Wilson Foley camp and giving it out on the air so that his listeners would call Roraback and attack him for his death penalty position. A witness described a meeting at which Rowland crafted a Wilson Foley position about online gambling and then arranged for her to be interviewed about it by his WTIC broadcast partner Will Marrotti.

Some of this stuff happened in secret. Some of it, out in the open. In my 16 years at WTIC, I never would have entertained the thought of giving out a candidate’s cell phone number on the air and urging people to call him in anger. And if I had, I would have expected to be summoned to the front office.  You almost wonder if the WTIC management was, like many before them, intimidated by Rowland.  They just plain let some of this stuff go on.  They didn’t set meaningful limits. And the stuff that sneaked past them is ruinous to the station’s credibility.

WTIC was hoping Rowland would be cleared. The opposite has happened. If an underling had handled things so horribly, with such disastrous consequences for the company, the underling would be fired. Management rarely plays a comparable price for its dreadful judgment.

Of course, maybe ownership will just dump the station.

Shana Sureck Courant photo

Shana Sureck Courant photo

 

 

Five Ever-Lovin’ Brown-Eyed Years With Chion, Betsy, Patrick, Greg……..

by Categorized: Uncategorized Date:

colin-5-year-face-book (1)For the first eight months of 2009, I was out of radio. WTIC-AM, under pressure from parent corporation CBS to dump salaries, fired both me and Diane Smith, the only non-conservative  voices in the daily line-up. They replaced my afternoon drive show with a news-traffic-weather rotation that had no anchor-host or “personality. They kept it that way for almost two years, until they hired, (gulp) John Rowland.

Meanwhile, I had time on my hands. I wrote my newspaper column and blogged. I wrote longer magazine pieces. I traveled to Japan for some teaching and lecturing, and, on the way home, stopped in the Bay Area to meet with Alice Waters, right before we appeared onstage at the Connecticut Forum with Anthony Bourdain and Duff Goldman. I did a lot of other stuff too, but I felt keenly the absence of daily radio, which I had been doing since 1992.

I fielded a few queries, but the only one that really interested me was from John Dankosky mr.dat WNPR. I was a long time public radio fan and had followed closely what he had done at WNPR during the conversion of the station from primarily classical music to news and talk. (Ironic note: I had repeated conversations with WTIC management about the implication of that conversion for “our” lineup. They assured me more than once that public radio would not affect their ratings.)

By springtime, it was pretty clear to me that I wanted to build something new at WNPR, but the management there had a simple rule for me. I had to raise the start-up money. So I did, with a lot of help from my friends, especially my friend Peter Shapiro who walked me through a few important doors in the world of commerce. Two famous author friends, Luanne Rice and Wally Lamb, stepped in as underwriters during that first year, as did CBT and, of course, Dr. Jerry Rosenfeld, who had fled WTIC along with me.

The initial decision I made was that the first and last voice on the show every day should not be mine, should be a woman, should be somebody younger. I had been noticing the work of

All photos here, except this one, by Chion Wolf for WNPR

All photos here, except this one, by Chion Wolf for WNPR

Chion Wolf doing what is called “continuity,” a melange of time, promos, underwriting credits and weather, which runs through the day on public radio. Knowing nothing about her, I approached her about being an “announcer,” who would introduce the show every day and say a few “last words” at the end. I pictured Chion as a kind of young Joni Mitchell, and I imagined those last words as hanging mysteriously in the air.

The second important decision I made wasn’t really a decision. Dankosky and producer Catie Talarski had a young man in mind, coming off an internship, who they thought could produce the show. His name was Patrick Skahill, a scholarly young man with a vast panoply of interests and a quiet sense of humor. He was perfect. Patrick and I spent about six weeks in the summer of 2009 trying to figure out what we were going santapatrickto put on the air. Meanwhile it sank in that Chion Wolf was not a young Joni Mitchell. Maybe a young Gracie Allen, a kind of old school comedian with razor sharp timing and hilarious instincts. So I started writing comic material for her, and I’m still doing that today. (Sometimes, I barely have to write. Click the blue arrow here. I deft you not to laugh.)

We went on the air Aug. 31, 2009 with Gail Collins of the New York Times and Trinity College professor Irene Papoulis as guests. First shows are almost kind of bumpy, but we got through it.  It would take months to find the right rhythm and tone. So, by the way, come to our anniversary party. You’re officially invited.

The biggest surprise to me — and I suppose many others — was how little of what I had done in my 16-year commercial radio run would work on WNPR.  Almost nothing was transferable. I had to teach myself a whole new way of doing radio and craft a radically different on-air persona. On WTIC, I had been a brat, a highly educated enfant terrible and Pan-like agent of chaos. Trying that on WNPR would be like asking Don Imus to host the Macneil/Lehrer News Hour. It was not to be. I began to write Chion as the Pan-like figure, which was not a stretch.

I could go on, but the history of the show’s first five years is probably more interesting to me than to anyone else. Last year Patrick decided he’d rather be a famous science reporter. Meanwhile we had discovered a new producer in our midst,
new betsyBetsy Kaplan, a former nurse with a wide-ranging curiosity and intellect very similar to Patrick’s. Betsy is now the spine and central nervous system of the show. She is what keeps us upright. We discovered, in the company’s IT department, the perfect comic foil for Chion, Greg Hill who now regularly turns up in the show intros and runs our Twitter account and is generally our fourth Beatle.

We’ve done well over 1,000 shows. We have three unspoken rules that shape our thinking:

1. One of us has to love the idea.

2. Somehow, we have to challenge the material in a way it is not typically challenged.

3 We’re not really into rules.

Also, “Ape not kill ape,” but that’s more like a guideline.

This left the door open to all sorts of choices. We did a show set in 2033. We did a “What If This Isn’t Reality?” show about the question of whether we’re living in some kind of hologrammic simulation. We did a show about the heart transplant of radio newswoman Beth Bradley. We did a show — I can barely explain this one — about what it would be like to have no capacity for language, any language, including sign language. A show about pi, a show about infinity, a show (ahead of its time) about the scientific uses of origami. Shows about nerds, snobs and high school debaters. (I think Mark Oppenheimer was on all three of those.) We did a show about three famous Harriets (Beecher Stowe, Tubman and the Spy) with Harriet Jones guest-handling announcer duties. We did salutes to musical instruments: the banjo (Bela Fleck and Noam Pikelny both contributed), the harmonica, the ukulele (Jake Shimabukuro and other virtuosos performed in studio) and most recently an amazing all accordion show. I don’t know why, but I often think of our salute to whistling as the most nearly perfect show we’ve ever done.

We did a salute to urine.

One of our best days ever was a full hour with the wild Jill Sobule singing and talking in studio. Other live performances included The Punch Brothers, Mike Doughty and Meklit Hadero. Grayson Hugh, the musician I have loved the longest, has visited many times and wrote a song for us.  One of the shows dearest to our hearts was the hour we spent with his father, Ivor, whose story was basically the history of broadcasting in Connecticut. Ivor died two months later.  I’ve done long-form interviews with Thomas Moore (twice), Philippe Petit, Peter Tork, and Paul Winter. Get ready for one with jazz legend and “Schoolhouse Rock” creator Bob Dorough. That’s already in the can, and it’s great. It’ll run on Sept. 9, one day after our  full-show interview with (gasp) Sir Tom Stoppard in front of a live audience.

Speaking of Tork, one of our peculiar memories is a show about Boy Bands for which we invented a fake group called Next In Line (Patrick’s name) who rehearsed a song called “Food Court Love,” written by me and Chion (but I think the title might have been Oppenheimer’s idea). Click the arrow.

We turned Wally Lamb, Eric Danton and Joan Holiday into a long-running and much beloved panel of “music mavens” who introduce the audience to new songs and (ruefully) dissect the thorny subject otherwise known as the Song of the Summer. We turned Bill Curry and comedian Julia Pistell into an annual pair of March Madness handicappers. (Julia uses indices such as the food most popular near each college.) We started taking the show each year to the Berkshire International Film Festival (with guests such as karenKaren Allen, Peter Reigert and Jim Bouton) and the New Haven International Festival of Pancakes, Art and Ideas.

We’ve got big plans in the immediate future to do our first-ever show from New York City (at the trendy Subculture).  Also on our wish list, shows from the Philip Johnson Glass House and from the Barnum Musem. 

Along the way, we invented some new forms. I wanted to do a regular show where I picked the panelists first and then figured out the topics later (the reverse of the way public radio likes to operate). Thus was born The Nose, a free-wheeling Friday show that has spawned a new generation of Connecticut radio favorites: Papoulis, jacquesJacques Lamarre, Rand Cooper, James Hanley, Theresa Cramer, Tracy Wu Fastenberg, Luis Figueroa, Jim Chapdelaine, Duby McDowell, Patty McQueen, Carolyn Paine …. well the list, as they say, goes on and on. When Patrick left us, Betsy and I went to work on making our Monday episode more time-sensitive and keyed to topics that bubbled up over the weekend, as opposed to something we’d been working on for six days.  We now call that The Scramble, usually based on a three-topic conversation with one “super-guest” (like Frank Rich or Anna Sale) and two newsy segments.

We’ve forged longstanding partnerships with a group of regular contributors who include experimental philosopher Jonathan Keats, writers Lev Grossman and Brian Francis Slattery, America’s Greatest Living Film Critic and America’s Auxiliary Break Glass In Case of Emergency Greatest Living Film Critic, writer Amanda Hess, two different people named Steve Metcalf, and pretty much everybody from Slate, especially June Thomas and Dahlia Lithwick. We were lucky enough to have Mike Pesca follow us pretty much from the start. Speaking of Pesca, he is amused not only by our successes but by our failures, in which we take a certain improbable pride. Sometimes we do a show — one on toast and one on spoons come to mind — because the idea seems like such a bad one that we can’t resist trying. Sometimes those really are bad ideas. See above. Or ask Pesca.

We’ve had great interns. Lydia Brown basically took over our show for one glorious summer during her steady ascent to become, eventually, a Galadriel-like figure who rules gently over the universe. That’s why we did a show on the “deep web” before anybody else was talking about it. Right now, Josh Nilaya is a kind of fifth Beatle, developing shows on his own. And a special shout out to Jules Lefebvre for his voice work on this memorable intro.

Daily radio shows are hard. It’s not the effort of any one show. It’s the cumulative drain. Mr. Dankosky and I (and now Pesca) understand this in a way a person who hasn’t lived it cannot. Your best work expires in 24 hours, and the crowing demand for something new begins, really, about five minutes after you sign off.

So you need amazing people. I need Betsy and Chion and Greg and Josh and executive producer Catie Talarski. I need my co-workers Mr. Dankosky, Lydia, Tucker Ives, ace newsman Jeff Cohen, Sir Ray Hardman, and the rest of the great WNPR news staff. And Gene Amatruda, who is basically Spock, Scotty, Geordi and Data rolled into one, if Starfleet Command had been a little more open to plaid flannel.

It’s odd. People still tell me they miss that crazy guy from WTIC. I miss him too. He was probably closer to the afflatus of my true comic Muse than anything I will ever do. But I didn’t really belong there. It wasn’t home. This is home. The people I work with, the people who lay themselves out to do this impossible show, they’re home. As somebody said, this must be the place.

Guess I must be having fun.

 

 

 

 

 

The Trolls Are Unhappy

by Categorized: Uncategorized Date:

This is my column this week. I urge you to read the comments as well. The trolls are grievously wounded, especially the guy who says I’m being “sarchastic.” Otto, the troll who’s complaining about the big words, complains about that all the time. In a previous installment, he said the word “cudgel” was too esoteric. No, I’m not kidding.

WikiMedia Commons

WikiMedia Commons

 

What’s on the Colin McEnroe Show Next Week?

by Categorized: Uncategorized Date:

 

RWE, circa 1872, via Wikimedia Commons

RWE, circa 1872, via Wikimedia Commons

“In this refulgent summer, it has been a luxury to draw the breath of life. The grass grows, the buds burst, the meadow is spotted with fire and gold in the tint of flowers. The air is full of birds, and sweet with the breath of the pine, the balm-of-Gilead, and the new hay. Night brings no gloom to the heart with its welcome shade. Through the transparent darkness the stars pour their almost spiritual rays. Man under them seems a young child, and his huge globe a toy. The cool night bathes the world as with a river, and prepares his eyes again for the crimson dawn. The mystery of nature was never displayed more happily. The corn and the wine have been freely dealt to all creatures, and the never-broken silence with which the old bounty goes forward, has not yielded yet one word of explanation. One is constrained to respect the perfection of this world, in which our senses converse.”

 

That is, of course, the beginning to Emerson’s Harvard Divinity School commencement address.  Did you know that only seven people were graduating? And that one of them blew off commencement? Six people! Some of the greatest prose ever spoken on U.S. soil.  Oh well.

 

That has nothing to do with any of our shows this week, but it’s good for all of us, in the summer, to revisit RWE’s words.

 

MONDAY:  Amanda Marcotte is one of Slate.com’s top writers. She thinks Bill Maher is gross, which is a promising bit of common ground, if you know what I mean. She’ll be our first guest of the day on the Scramble. She has written recently on the humanitarian crisis on the U.S. Border, as have I, so I’m guessing we may talk about that.  And we’re devoting the other two segments of our show to a discussion of Connecticut’s refusal to participate in sheltering the young refugees. Emerson, in his speech, was admirably lucid about this kind of thing: “Good is positive. Evil is merely privative, not absolute: it is like cold, which is the privation of heat. All evil is so much death or nonentity. Benevolence is absolute and real.”

 

TUESDAY: Emerson ended his speech with these words: “Can’t you taste this gold? Remember my name. ‘Bout to blow.” No, he did not. I was just testing whether you were paying attention. Those are words from “Fancy” by Iggy Azalea, which is the current leading contender for the Song of The Summer. Our music mavens Wally Lamb (yes, that Wally Lamb), Eric Danton and Joan Holiday will be on the case — noses slightly wrinkled — as we sort out whether any other song can overthrow Iggy. Critic Amanda Dobbins laid out the task quite clearly: “There is no such thing as a ?personal? song of summer. We do not anoint multiple songs of summer. There can only be one; the Song of Summer, by its very definition, is a consensus choice. It is the song that wrecks wedding dance floors. It is the song that you and your mother begrudgingly agree on (even though your mom has no idea what rhymes with ?hug me? and won’t stop yelling it in public.) It does not necessarily have to hit No. 1 on the charts, but it should probably be on the charts, because it must be widely played. It must bring people together. It must be a shared enthusiasm.”

 

WEDNESDAY: There was never any question about Emerson’s middle name. Where’s Waldo? Right between the Ralph and the Emerson. And Henry David Thoreau. Amos Bronson Alcott. Transcendentalists were big on middle names. One of the later Transcendentalists was named Octavius Brooks Frothingham. What do you think about that? We’re doing a whole show about middle names. Abraham Lincoln did not have one, but most people of his era did. A recent essay on the New York Times suggested that middle initials, anyway, are falling out of favor. But that’s just one element of our journey into interstitial onomastics.

 

THURSDAY: There is something entirely mysterious about our relationship with stuffed animals and other stuffed toys. From the Steiff bear to the (Connecticut-bred) Cabbage Patch Kid, modern children have embraced stuffed creatures; and when, in the words of Paul, it came time “to put away childish things,” we have often found it difficult to do so. Isn’t that right, Bobo? Sorry, I was talking to my plush ocelot. Been with me since law school. We’ll explore the allure of these transitional objects, and even speak with a “travel agent” in Japan who books trips around the Floating Kingdom for stuffed toys. I don’t really know what RWE would have said about teddy bears, etc. They might have struck him as some kind of link to our polytheistic, pre-Christian past.  “I’d rather be a pagan suckl’d in a creed outworn,” wrote Wordsworth, “than give up Captain Nuzzles” (who scholars believe was a kind of velveteen dolphin).

 

FRIDAY. Oh my goodness, is the week ending already?  This show will be The Nose, our weekly roundtable about things that arose in Culture during the week.  To know its topics today would be to peer into the future, as Emerson attempted to do at the end of his address: “I look for the new Teacher, that shall follow so far those shining laws, that he shall see them come full circle; shall see their rounding complete grace; shall see the world to be the mirror of the soul; shall see the identity of the law of gravitation with purity of heart; and shall show that the Ought, that Duty, is one thing with Science, with Beauty, and with Joy.” So that could happen, right?

 

Final thoughts: I could really imagine Emerson saying, “Can’t you taste this gold?” but meaning the divine energy that pervades the corn and the wine. And the notion of someone named Iggy Azalea would have, at minimum, drawn him forward, as opposed to pushing him away.

Congratulations, Governor, You Got the Morality AND the Politics Wrong

by Categorized: Uncategorized Date:

Dunce (7885704332)
When the federal government asked Connecticut if it could use the old Southbury Training School to house, temporarily, 2,000 Central American refugee /migrant kids, the answer was no.

My column this week addresses the morality of this.

Now let’s look at the politics. Somebody in his campaign surely told Malloy he’d get beaten up if he took the kids. So what about that?

a. At this point in the race, he gets beaten up either way. Yesterday in their debate, his Republican opponents Tom Foley and John McKinney discovered their inner Jane Fondas and took whacks at Malloy for NOT housing the kids.

b. It somehow looks even worse with Deval Patrick stepping up to help. 

c. It could have been framed neatly. Connecticut was offered federal money to fix up a bad building and then care for these kids.  That’s jobs, jobs, jobs. Malloy could have made Connecticut jobs part of the deal.

d. At minimum, Malloy could have said, “Look, Southbury is falling down, but we do want to help. I’ve got people inventorying all the space, public and private, we do have. Let’s work something out.”

e. In another close election, he needs the Latino vote. Big time. Think he helped himself with this?