One Story — Many Media

by Categorized: Uncategorized Date:

As I prepare for today’s show about magazines, I’m aware that magazines are no longer magazines.  That is, they are for more fluid, less top-down. A typical magazine might be many things.  A monthly print edition. Supplementary online materials including blogs by writers who have followings that ignore most if not all of the rest of the magazine. Videos originating from godknowswhat source. Information is, more than ever, a very complicated mix.  Let me walk you through an example from today.

Because one of our guests is the wily and parsimonious Victor S. Navasky, I decided to look at the website of The Nation, to see whether its editor and publisher emeritus would recognize it. I was drawn to something involving Dave Zirin, who’s a great example of a guy you might follow even if The Nation itself were not your cup of tea. Zirin is one of the few unreservedly and radically iconoclastic sportswriters alive. So I clicked on it.  It turned out to be not-exactly-Nation content.  I didn’t know anything about this Sandusky interview. I wanted to know more. I wound up at the Daily Beast.  Is the Daily Beast even a magazine?  I guess it is. But that item was a very unsatisfactory snap shot.  I did note that it involved somebody named John Ziegler.  Could this possibly be the guy implicated in David Foster Wallace’s massively important and wonderful Atlantic story? According to Deadspin — why do I think that Deadspin is not a magazine but Grantland is? — it’s the same guy. (I should add here that the comments on the Deadspin piece, sympathetic to Ziegler, made me want to know a lot more.) Meanwhile, I layered my own perception of this story with what I know about the Today show, having last night read the huge New York magazine piece about its desperate days.

I still don’t think I understand this story.  We might tackle it on The Nose Friday. But it’s a nice example of how vital magazines are to grasping something and also how they are no longer enough.

Oh what the hell.  While I was trying to get a handle on this story, I even looked at PerezHilton.  God help me.

The Courant is using Facebook comments on stories. To comment on articles, sign into Facebook and enter your comment in the field below. Comments will appear in your Facebook News Feed unless you choose otherwise. To report spam or abuse, click the X next to the comment. For guidelines on commenting, click here.

3 thoughts on “One Story — Many Media

  1. Richard

    Flipboard announced yesterday users can publish their own magazines. Sure its a blatant Word Press rip off for the new decade. Write a two paragrpah summary of an article you like, add a picture, a link to the original story (of any type) and publish away in a form factor that is device friendly and scales to 55″ TVs and All-in-one PCs.

    In the future no one will be caught dead blogging. That’s so old school stale. Facebook? For teen age girls. It smells old. Like MySpace. Publish magazines instead!

  2. Richard

    This need for supplementary sources recently came up in the context of self-penned biographies (by journalists) which more often than not are Picasso-like self-portraits complete with dimensional distortions and colors bearing little relation to what most call realism.

    Figure out the truth about that state of affairs.

  3. Richard

    On The UConn column: the UConn Jack Dempsey Teaching Hospital ranking of “last in the nation” of 258 ranked is this weeks humbling of UConn.

    More money isn’t always the answer. Effective management counts. Malloy will respond with bonding; it’s something he can control. Governing the wonderful world or Regents and overpaid credentialed thieves is a whole other issue.

    UConn’s public facilities are at a numerical disadvantage in any arms race against states like Michigan and Texas. They simply have more taxpayers to milk to support their flagship Universities.

    Factor in CT’s cradle-to-grave worship of public sector ineptitude and it’s a bad mix for CT competitiveness in the 21st century. The only good news is the use of Top 20 salary surveys to ensure CT is paying each and every administrator as if they are a Top 20 in their field administrator. That is, if you call that good news.

Comments are closed.