Obama Visit Comes Amid Friction With Labor Unions

by Categorized: Labor, Manufacturing, Politics, Public finance Date:

Labor unions might not be as thrilled with Obama this week as they usually are, as two areas of friction emerged ahead of the president’s visit to West Hartford.

The first is the gun control issue that’s attracting Obama to Connecticut in the first place.  As it happens, the United Auto Workers union has 489 jobs at Colt’s Manufacturing Co. and Colt Defense LLC, at the companies’ plant just a few miles from where Obama spoke.

UAW has been silent on Connecticut’s ban on the sale of AR-15-type rifles to the general public — which are made at the plant in large numbers — and on Obama’s push for a national ban.  Obama did a lot to help the union during the auto bailouts of 2009, but no one is saying this silence is payback.

The second issue is a clear rift between Obama and the organized labor coalitions to worked so hard in both of his elections.  Obama wants to change the way Social Security is calculated, according to numerous published reports, in a way that would lower the  annual cost-of-living increases, known as COLA.

The change will be contained in Obama’s budget, due to be presented to Congress Wednesday — and unions are dead-set against the idea.

Several labor leaders said they were not aware of any protests at the University of Hartford Monday, where Obama spoke, but that doesn’t mean they’re happy about the plan.

“We believe that’s not the way to solve the problems of Social Security,” said John W. Olsen, president of the state AFL-CIO and a former state Democratic Party chairman. “If I have a chance, of course I would tell him, ‘Don’t go after the COLA.'”

The issue has angered much of Obama’s base and united labor unions with groups such as AARP.  Moveon.org, the grassroots group organized to elect Obama and push his policies, has launched a petition.

And if the president was listening to WWUH-FM 91.3, the University of Hartford’s radio station, on his way to the campus, he’d have heard a hilarious slam against him — from a left-wing folk singer.  The station ended a timely political set with Anne Feeney, in Irish folk style, performing a song with the chorus, “Who are you and what did you do with the man I voted for?”

Opponents of the Obama plan, including Olsen, say the better plan is to raise the income limit at which the 6.2 percent Social Security payroll tax is collected, now $113,700.

“We’ve been meeting with our Congressional delegation. We’re making our opinion known,” said Olsen, who did not expect to meet with Obama on Monday. “If you’re going to solve the problems of Social Security by cutting COLA, that’s unacceptable.”

The gun control issue is trickier. AFL-CIO, which includes the UAW and its members at Colt, does not have a position on Malloy’s ban or on a national ban on so-called assault weapons.

“We’re going to fight for good manufacturing jobs, okay? There’s got to be an industrial policy in this country,” Olsen said.

As for the Connecticut ban, Olsen said the manufacturers should do what they did after the partial bans on military-style rifles in Connecticut in 1993 and in the nation, between 1994 and 2004, when the national ban ended. “I’m hoping that what we can do is modify these weapons and sell just as many of these rifles in Connecticut,” Olsen said.

That may be harder to do this time around, as the ban restricts even a single military-style characteristic, such as the pistol grip that largely defines the AR-15.

Olsen downplays any disagreement  between organized labor and Democrats Obama and Malloy. He does not believe UAW is muzzled from criticism of the ban as a result of loyalty to Obama. “I’m not afraid to say I disagree with him on COLA’s, right?”

Olsen added, “The only person I agree with all the time is me.”

Obama would say the same thing, of course. He’s expected to propose the COLA change as a way of compromising, to win higher taxes on very wealthy Americans, which may make sense — depending on the tax.  That’s realpolitik, the practice of actually governing rather than campaigning based on ideology.

On gun control, opponents of the proposed (and in Connecticut, enacted) bans on military-style weapons should speak up, even if they’re in bed with Obama, since the bans might not save a single life anyway.  It’s clear that the ultra-liberal music movement crowd isn’t pulling punches, based on one of the set-up lines in “The Man I Voted For.”

“You said you’d do things differently, now that’s what makes me sore.”



The Courant is using Facebook comments on stories. To comment on courant.com articles, sign into Facebook and enter your comment in the field below. Comments will appear in your Facebook News Feed unless you choose otherwise. To report spam or abuse, click the X next to the comment. For guidelines on commenting, click here.

13 thoughts on “Obama Visit Comes Amid Friction With Labor Unions

  1. Don886

    Social programs will need reform if the Us is to avoid following Greece. Raising caps on SS won’t fix the problem since wealthy will only get more credits for benefits.

    1. America Is Dying

      But there is $25 Million a year available for Pro Athletes to play a kids game! And you’re OK with that?
      That’s what’s wrong with America! Greed!

  2. alan

    almost all union members in Conn are government unions who dont get social security. I know many teachers, fire, police and none get it..but get a plan that they get 10 years early for twice as much as the soc security maximum of 29K. Why would Olson, et al care a bit about soc security? My father was an IAM machinist at Winchesters when there were 100k members in Conn, but sadly there is no viable public sector anymore in Conn.

    1. I

      The older members do get Social Security as well, and with no reduction in pension benefits, my father in-in-law collects both, with never working in the public sector.

      1. alan

        i assume you father in law is an old man but there are essentially no young private sector union members in Conn anymore..maybe a few legacy UTC people. The present union members are 98% govt employed.

  3. pete

    Obama doesn’t care about the UNION pukes. He used them to get obamacare a/k/a N**I care. He will use them to ram through amnesty for the 60 yes 60 million illegals and then will cast the union boys and gals adrift because he aint running for re-election any more like he told the Russian president last summer. Remember “I’ll have more flexibility after the election”. When did barry stand with the union members NEVER. He has frozen federal UNION employee pay since Jan 1, 2010, He has increase their pension contributions and is recommending to increase it again. HE USES PEOPLE. And you UAW members at COLT where is your pathetic union leaders. Do they represent you. They have NO opinion on YOUR JOBS.

  4. Mountain Dogs

    “Obama did a lot to help the unions during the auto bailouts”. That is a huge understatement ont you think Dan?Do you know how much help? That would a great story but doubt your boss would print it in this paper.

  5. America Is Dying

    Senate Gun Vote Tally.

    Sen. Andres Ayala (D) YES.

    Sen. Dante Bartolomeo (D) YES.

    Sen. Toni Boucher (R) YES.

    Sen. Beth Bye (D) YES.

    Sen. Steve Cassano (D) YES.

    Sen. Clark Chapin (R) NO.

    Sen. Eric Coleman (D) YES.

    Sen. Joseph Crisco (D) YES.

    Sen. Paul Doyle (D) YES.

    Sen. Bob Duff (D) YES.

    Sen. Len Fasano (R) YES.

    Sen. John Fonfara (D) YES.

    Sen. L. Scott Frantz (R) YES.

    Sen. Terry Gerratana (D) YES.

    Sen. Tony Guglielmo (R) NO.

    Sen. Toni Harp (D) YES.

    Sen. Joan Hartley (D) YES.

    Sen. Rob Kane (R) NO.

    Sen. Kevin Kelly (R) YES.

    Sen. John Kissel (R) NO.

    Sen. Gary LeBeau (D) YES.

    Sen. Carlo Leone (D) YES.

    Sen. Art Linares (R) NO.

    Sen. Martin Looney (D) YES.

    Sen. Joe Markley (R) NO.

    Sen. Andrew Maynard (D) NO.

    Sen. John McKinney (R) YES.

    Sen. Michael McLachlan (R) YES.

    Sen. Edward Meyer (D) YES.

    Sen. Anthony Musto (D) YES.

    Sen. Cathy Osten (D) NO.

    Sen. Gayle Slossberg (D) YES.

    Sen. Andrea Stillman (D) YES.

    Sen. Jason Welch (R) NO.

    Sen. Donald Williams (D) YES.

    Sen. Kevin Witkos (R) NO.

  6. Liberalism is a mental disorder.

    Obama don’t need no steenkin’ unions. He’s reelected and could care about you useful idiots who voted for him again.

    Well done Obamatrons.

  7. Obamatard

    So Obozo wants to decrease SS for Americans who paid into it without touching handouts to illegals and welfare cretins.

  8. bahmi

    A vote for Obama is a vote for drones, murders of innocent people in wars we don’t belong in, and continued strong support for torture. Obama is a communist and if you haven’t looked lately, the country is sinking like a stone. But, you wonderful Connecticut voters who supported this nation destroyer will go down, too. What is there about communism that you love, anyway? Or, most likely, why are you so trusting of a jerk president who laughs at you will he raises taxes, has plans for reducing social security and Medicare? Then again, we with a pulse realize that poorly informed voters voted for this guy Obama, a president we know nothing about. Imagine. Did you take his cell phone offer and vote for him? IN the end, which is coming, remember your part when you voted for this bum. He comes to UHart, lies like a rug, and gets applause!! Are you addicted to his lies? Some day, we will all be sorry fools like YOU voted for the communist and head liar of this once proud nation.

Comments are closed.