Why Susan Bysiewicz Can Continue Running An Inaccurate Ad

by Categorized: First Amendment, Legal Affairs, Media, Politics Date:

As my colleague Rick Green reports, Senate candidate Chris Murphy is calling on television stations to stop running an ad from opponent Susan Bysiewicz that incorrectly claims Murphy is the biggest recipient of hedge fund cash among Democrats in Congress.

The Bysiewicz campaign has acknowledged the error but said it would keep the spot running, prompting Murphy’s lawyers to take to their word processors and lean on local stations to yank the ad. That’s not likely to happen, because misleading or not, broadcasters are generally required by law to run candidate ads exactly as they get them.

The letter from Murphy’s lawyers cites – as these sorts of cease-and-desist letters frequently do – a 1961 Federal Communications Commission ruling that broadcast stations have a duty “to protect the public from false, misleading or deceptive advertising.” What the letter leaves out is that that duty is limited to commercial advertising – not political advertising.

When it comes to political ads – at least political ads directly from bona fide federal candidates – station’s are generally prohibited from censoring or refusing the spots, no matter how off-the-wall they may be. In those cases, the FCC takes the position that the marketplace of ideas – not federal bureaucrats – are the best defense against false ads.

In other words: There’s not much Murphy can do to get the spots pulled off the airwaves. But he is free to do all he can to hammer his opponent for the inaccuracy; like, for instance, sending letters from his lawyers to the stations – and the media – pointing out once again that the ad was wrong.

The Courant is using Facebook comments on stories. To comment on courant.com articles, sign into Facebook and enter your comment in the field below. Comments will appear in your Facebook News Feed unless you choose otherwise. To report spam or abuse, click the X next to the comment. For guidelines on commenting, click here.

3 thoughts on “Why Susan Bysiewicz Can Continue Running An Inaccurate Ad

  1. Jim Sorensen

    No wonder she wasn’t indorsed. How can you trust someone who distorts fact? If elected she would do the same thing. Just what we need another liar on Capitol Hill.

  2. ask.com

    Pretty component to content. I just stumbled upon your blog
    and in accession capital to claim that I acquire actually enjoyed account your blog posts.
    Anyway I’ll be subscribing to your augment or even I achievement you
    access consistently quickly.

    Feel free to surf to my blog … internet marketing business (ask.com)


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *