The dismantling of Chris Murphy.

Read the column.

 

 

 

7 Responses to Waiting For Chris Murphy

  1. Paul says:

    I find the ethics complaint to be a strange strategy coming from someone who wears bankruptcy like some weird badge of courage. I think McMahon risks making the tone and saturation style of her campaign a story that voters will tire of, much like two years ago.

  2. Frank says:

    He can not take Linda McMahon on his own. He can not match the amount of money that McMahon and Republican SuperPACS are going to throw at him. He has to take her on in the debates and use the little money he does have effectively. He will also need Bill Clinton to stump for him just like Blumenthal did. This will be a close race and Democrats need to be perfect in their strategy.

  3. Bruce R. Johnson says:

    Despite the negative campaign adds from both sides, Chris Murphy is clearly the more qualified candidate. If by chance she IS elected, Linda McMahon will have a tough time in Washington implementing her tax plan and overhauling Social Security and Medicare.

  4. Jim says:

    Annnnnd….Frank nails the Clinton bailout visit 5 weeks early!
    “Mah friend Chris here has no charisma, no ethics, and no other skills to earn a living, but come close, feel MAH charisma – no not THAT charisma – and show him some love. And be sure to vote for Hillary in 2016, oops I mean Obama in 2012!”

  5. Ted says:

    Just an observation about McMahon’s attach ad about Murphy’s lack of attendance at committee hearings and his counter attack with is 97% voting record. For once both are correct and make perfect sense once you realize that Murphy is nothing more than a two bit Pelosi pawn, that tows the party line. His opinion doesn”t count, just his vote. Connecticut deserves better than this in the Senate!

    • DaveJ says:

      How’s that Fox News kool-aid tasting today, Teddie? Must be quite the life, switching between Hannity and WWF Presents Raping Dead Bodies.

      Good for you. All that wholesomeness… woot woot.

  6. Alice In Wonderland says:

    Linda McMahon is nothing more than an old Carnival Barker.
    She will say anything to get people to play her game.
    The prizes offered … Chrome plated plastic trinkets.
    Come on people! This isn`t even funny!
    I don’t want to live in the state known for putting
    Linda McMahon on the floor of The U.S. Senate ! !
    She clearly illustrates having nothing intellectually to offer Connecticut in terms of a United States Senator. This is nothing but an empty facade; Behind Linda McMahon’s eyes exsists a vast void. Personally, I don’t think she has the capacity for the level of intelligence, or thought to perform as a United States Senator ; And I think her level of abstract thought and reasoning belongs on children`s television, Saturday Mornings.
    Vote for Linda McMahon and Jerry Springer on the Champipple Ballot Line.
    Kurt Russell and Michael Moore will be using
    Connecticut tax credits to produce a new movie for
    Monty Python Productions, called : ” Escape From Connecticut ” !
    Maybe this is all but a perverse and pathetic dream,
    and I’ll wake up. Heh – To think Linda McMahaon a serious contender to represent Connecticut, as a United States Senator!
    I gotta stop eating those Chocolate Frosted Sugar Bombs before bed.
    Rod Serling steps out from around the corner, And offers a Narrative :
    ” Submitted for your approval: Linda McMahon,
    Roller Derby Queen, or United States Senator?
    You decide your reality, when you cast your vote in
    The Twighlight Zone “

    You can put lipstick on an old carnival barker;
    And all you have is a carnival barker, with lipstick.