Stanford-UConn: More Than A Fairy Tale

by Categorized: Geno Auriemma, Stanford women's basketball, Tara VanDerveer Date:

Once upon a time in the Land of Steady Habits, a women’s basketball series between UConn and Tennessee grew from a tiny acorn into the grand oak that shaded its sport from disinterest for more than a decade.

From 1995 to 2007, it swayed sturdily to stage 22 of the most remarkable games in history of the sport, including five Final Four matchups, sprouting WNBA all-stars, Olympians, national champions and Hall of Famers.

But then arrived the summer hurricane of 2007. Fueled by the force of growing rancor between Tennessee coach Pat Summitt and UConn’s Geno Auriemma, they Lady Vols uprooted the series, seemingly stunting the sport in the midst of its growth spurt.

Tennessee-UConn was a rivalry in the purest form, one which perfectly fit Auriemma’s description.

“For there to be a rivalry, the other team has to beat you on a regular basis,” Auriemma said. “Otherwise, how could there be a rivalry.”

As fate would have it, whatever loss Huskies fans and television viewers were suffering from the loss of UConn-Tennessee would immediately be replace in a visage of red and white.

“Coach always made sure that we knew the difference between losing and getting beat,” said former UConn guard Kalana Greene, who now plays with the WNBA’s Connecticut Sun. “Most of the teams throughout the season we knew they could never beat us, we would have to lose to them.

 

“In the case of Stanford, they had one of the best coaches in college basketball. Their roster always had some of the most talented players in college basketball, and unsurprisingly some of the most athletic players, as well.

 

“We had played athletic teams and well-coached teams and beat them with ease, but with this team you couldn’t out run them or out jump them. It was a chess match and whoever made the right moves at the right times would win the game.

 

“So when we played Stanford, we knew that we were going to play the toughest mental game of our season and were facing one of the few teams (or only team) that could actually beat us.”

 

Stanford, the west coast powerhouse with the iconic coach in the pants, Tara VanDerveer, would beat – UConn in the national semifinals of the 2008 Final Four in Tampa, Fla.

Thanks to the coincidence and cooperation that has led to five other meetings since, including two more in the Final Four (2009 and 2010), the Huskies have met their new perfect match.

“I don’t know if there are any characteristics about it [the rivalry] that would distinquish it from the others we’ve had,” Auriemma said. “The Notre Dame rivalry [eight games in two seasons] is so familiar; we play them so much because they are in the Big East.  But the Stanford rivalry has gotten interesting over the last four or five years because of the importance of the games we’ve played against each other. We’ve met so many times in the Final Four. That’s how rivalries usually become big ones. It has to do with the importance of each game you play.

“If we played played each other in the regular season, but not the NCAA Tournament, it wouldn’t be as big as it’s become. The Notre Dame rivalry became big because it led to a number of meetings in the NCAAs [three national semifinals, including the last two]. It was the same with Tennessee. And it’s that way with Stanford.

“That is what escalates a rivalry.”

And so it seems appropriate that the two shall meet again Saturday at Maples Pavilion as the top two teams in the nation. No. 1 Stanford (11-0) plays No.2 UConn (10-0) for all the marbles currently sitting on the table.

“Yeah, I would say it’s a rivalry, but more than that it’s a measuring stick,” VanDerveer said. “When we play teams like Connecticut and Tennessee, we get to find out where we are and how much more we have to do.”
“Nobody cares about rankings when the ball goes up. But I know it’s good for fans and interest in the game.”

This will be the third time in the past four years Stanford and Connecticut will play as the top two teams in the nation. It marks the 51st time the top two teams in the Associated Press Poll will play since the poll’s inception for the 1976-77 season. The No. 1 team holds a 31-19 edge and has won the past nine meetings. The last time the No. 2 team won was Feb. 25, 2006 when No. 2 North Carolina defeated No. 1 Duke, 77-65 in Chapel Hill.

What’s more, Stanford’s national-best active home winning streak is now 82 on Dec. 15 with a 78-43 win over Pacific. It dates to Nov. 28, 2007 with a 96-61 victory over San Francisco.

Not only will their high stakes, but a lot at stake, as well.

In Stanford, UConn has found a perfect foil, an opponent it can compete with without the slightest trace of acrimony. Auriemma and VanDerveer and their staffs seem not only to respect each other, but like each other’s company.

“Stanford recruits the same type of kids we do,” Auriemma said. “They are extremely well-coached and always have tough, physical players. And it’s always a challenge to play them out there. It may be the hardest place in the nation for a visiting team to play.”

For that reason, the coaches have agreed to play each other annually in the regular season until further notice. This will the fourth year they’ve alternated home sites and the 2013-14 season will begin next November with the Cardinal in Connecticut.

This will be the 14th in series history, which began in 1988 and three straight Stanford wins through the end of the 1993-94 season. UConn holds a slight 7-6 advantage.

But since UConn beat Stanford in the semifinals of the 1995 Final Four, to advance to its world-altering championship game win over Tennessee, the series has swung in the Huskies’ direction.

Stanford’s only wins over UConn in the nine games played since 1995 have come in the Sweet 16 of 2005 NCAA Tournament, that national semifinal in 2008 and on Dec. 30, 2010, when the Cardinal ended UConn’s 90-game winning streak in Palo Alto.

“Yeah, we ended their streak, and I’m sure they’d like to do the same thing to us,” Stanford guard Toni Kokenis said. “This is an opportunity for them. And I’m sure they will be ready.”

Stanford became No. 1 on November 16th by defeating Baylor, 71-69, in Hawaii. Baylor played the last 36 minutes without its All-American guard, Odessey Sims. And yet the Associated Press leapfrogged Stanford over UConn into the top spot. And they’ve been frozen in time since, six weeks, matching the program’s longest tenure at the top first set during the first six weeks of the 1996-97 season.

And more thing: UConn has lost all three games it’s played at Maples Pavilion.

“For UConn, in their eyes, I’m sure they think they deserve the No. 1 ranking and there’s an argument to be made. But they are really hungry to prove themselves,” Stanford junior Chiney Ogwumike said.

 

 

 

The Courant is using Facebook comments on stories. To comment on courant.com articles, sign into Facebook and enter your comment in the field below. Comments will appear in your Facebook News Feed unless you choose otherwise. To report spam or abuse, click the X next to the comment. For guidelines on commenting, click here.

14 thoughts on “Stanford-UConn: More Than A Fairy Tale

  1. Kevin Cavanaugh

    I agree Freddy. I believe UCONN has the edge from the 3, but the game will be decided in the paint. Dolson can neutralize Chiney and Stanford has no one to counter Stew. Also, UCONN is too quick on turnovers. Faris’ play on both ends will prove too much for Stanford. Go Huskies.

    1. FREDDYKOOL

      THE PAINT IS WHERE THIS GAME WILL BE DECIDED, FOUL TROUBLE, GENO SHOULD HAVE USED HEATHER MUCH MORE THAN HE HAS ESPECIALLY WITH 30,40,50 POINT LEADS. BUT WE SHALL SEE WON’T WE!

      1. Kevin Cavanaugh

        Freddy, again I agree with you. Buck is big and solid and when she is playing defense, she is a rock. She could sub for Dolson or Stew to give them a rest or if Stew gets a few fouls, which she has a few times. Buck has a lot of fouls to give because she is in for such little time. She could hawk Tinkle to take some of her game away. Being a senior, Buck cherishes every minute she gets and she just might be a sleeper in this one. Geno, give her some playing time in Maples and you will not regret it.

    2. FREDDYKOOL

      FREDDYKOOL: AND I THINK 4 OUTTA THERE 5 R 6′ 3″ OR BETTER….H’mmmmmmmmmmmm

      1. Kevin Cavanaugh

        Two of them usually ride the bench though – just like a few UCONN players did the last two years. Still, they could rise to the occassion.

  2. village idiot

    This will be the GAME of 2012, no doubt. Baylor with be the game of 2013.
    Perceptive comments for Geno, Tara, Kalana.
    John OF ALL THE COLUMN YOU HAVE WRITTEN THIS HAS GOT TO BE A 10 PLUS (1 LOW 10 GREAT). I can’t tell you when I enjoyed on of your’s more.
    I shall be sitting on the edge of my seat watching the Stanford/Uconn battle, and it will be a battle.

    I believe with a new coach Tenn will finally see the light at the end of the tunnel and re ignite the tenn/uconn games. Everyone (including me) need to let Genos glib lip miscues go into the bit bucket and forget them. He is a nice caring man, with a fault of bad speak.

    1. Big Jim

      The plot for Saturday is that Stewart will get two early fouls. We’ve all seen this (big player in early foul trouble) before in Women’s basketball and it is especially true at Stanford.

      V.I. you little brown noser, you. :)

  3. TexasBogger

    The “D” will be there. If the Huskies shoot the ball reasonably well they should win.

    Note to V.I.: The GAME will come in March in the Final Four.

  4. Baylor 9-1 FKA "Baylor 80-0"

    Hope the refs don’t fall for the flop and call a fair game. Just want to see were these two teams are. But remember Baylor is lurking. Can’t count on riffs with Mulky and Sims anymore.

  5. RAY RAY

    the difference between uconn and baylor is when greiner grads youll never hear from baylor again.uconn will still be playing for rings.

  6. Ed

    …” grew from a tiny acorn into the grand oak that shaded
    it’s sport from disinterest for more than a decade.”

    You’ve been communing with your muse again, John.

Comments are closed.